KEVIN WILLMOTT - Revealing American history in CSA: The Confederate States of America
"One of the main reasons why I wanted to make the film is because the Civil War's still going on in America. There's still many people that want to hold onto the Confederacy as this great concept that had nothing to do with slavery. But if you honestly look at
history, and you read books outside of battlefield books, you quickly find out that it was all about slavery. So that's the chief reason why I wanted to make the film, to finally give the history of America from this other point of view. The Confederate flag still flies over the State of Mississippi, over the State House. You still see it on a lot of people's cars and trucks. You still see Hollywood making movies that celebrate the Confederacy, in various ways, as a sad, lost cause. A great civilisation gone with the wind, as Gone with the Wind calls it. But from the slave point of view, there's nothing civilised about it. "



Daniel Grant, a
fourth-year archaeology student at University College London, has just seen the
premiere of his first feature film, Dark Night, which he wrote and
directed. It is the horrific tale of a house party gone terribly wrong, as the
guests find themselves stalked by a mystifying evil presence. Here, he gives
his view on the whole experience…
"Zero Day could never have been made in Hollywood. Elephant [Gus Van Sant‘s Columbine-inspired film], I don't think, could even have been made in Hollywood. The larger studios would never touch it. Not before. Not after. Maybe in a long time from now. I remember watching Columbine on television and thinking to myself, ‘God, someday somebody's going to make some
awful Columbine epic and it's going to stress the heroism of the day, however they find it.' Not that there wasn't heroism, I'm not trying to make light of the people that did heroic things in real life, but that, to me, is unfortunately not the significant story. It is a significant story, and someone could tell that, definitely. But I think the thing that America is culturally reeling from is, how could this happen? Why would this happen? And what, if anything, can we take away from this?"
"Bettie's
got a cult following in America. She is a pop icon. A lot of people
dress like her, they do a burlesque show, and a lot of people will put
on the wig and do acts like Bettie Page. And fashion and everything,
the looks were inspired by things that she wore then. When Madonna had
the cone bras in the early 90s, she was doing that in the 50s. As for
her sexuality, I'm sure she was aware of it. You know, the word naïve
keeps coming up, but to me it was a knowing naiveté. She knew what was
going on but it was the attitude of the 50s to pick and choose what you
wanted to look at and how closely you wanted to look at it. I think she
was doing her job, and she was making her living, but I'm sure she knew
what was going on. But it didn't serve her in any way to really
investigate it and I think when she thought about it, she was making
people happy and she wasn't judging them for a fetish. It was like,
‘OK, so you like shoes, you like whips or whatever.' I think within the
realm of what they were doing it was like acting or playing dress up."
"We made Hard Candy for under a million dollars, we shot it in 18 days, and the reason we did that was because if we hadn't, we would have been forced to change the script and make it a little more lightweight. That was never something we wanted to do. Or would do. In fact this is a rare instance where the filmmakers set out to make a film and pretty much made the film they wanted to make. I said to Brian [Nelson, the screenwriter], ‘Do they realise what we're doing?' and he'd kind of look at me and go, ‘I don't think they do, no.'
(KL) "We could have made a whole film of brutal acts and gone on for twenty-four hours. I mean just imagine it: they slit a man's throat, they tie him to a cart, they drag him for a mile and kill him. They beat a man's skull in. A woman comes to the door with a child in her arms, they shoot the mother. I mean how much brutality do you have to show for someone to actually take it and say, ‘Yes, we did that', without trying to get a sort of dagger in underneath?
"
We
see these things happen on the television, and of course we’re shocked
and momentarily we stop, pay our respects, but then we want to carry on
with our lives, untouched, because it’s the World Cup coming, because
I’m going to the pub, because I’ve got my holiday booked, and all that.
And what we expect of these families is having had their anointed
moment as victims, they disappear. But if you’re a family, compelled
against your will and never expecting it to happen, parked up against
the overwhelming psychological imperative to seek meaning, you refuse
to accept victimhood. You demand to speak. You demand that we all
address this issue. Why has this happened? What are we going to do
about it?